Functionalism and Structuralism

In this entrance I am explaining what we understand for Functionalism and Structuralism the last theories about Culture and Society.

Funtionalism
Bronislaw Malinoswski was his ideologist, part of the assumption that the function of the elements of a culture is always to satisfy some basic need such as food, the production of goods, rest, reproduction, physical security, etc.

These needs are the origin of the derivatives that must also be met. Thus, the feeding generates cooperation for the crop, and the reproduction originates the norms of sexual approach. Society then creates the appropriate institutions and forms of organization to solve both types of needs, such as the economy or the family.

Cultural change occurs precisely when an institution fails to fulfill its purpose and becomes dysfunctional.

According to Malinowski, once we have thoroughly explained the social function of an institution, we will have known scientifically everything that is possible to know.

Structuralism
While the currents discussed above focused on the knowledge of social and cultural facts, structuralism investigates the ultimate foundation of both. It aims to know the deep and universal structures that explain the main features, complexes and cultural institutions.

Claude Levi-Strauss was initially a philosopher interested in human nature and the solutions that cultural anthropology could contribute to the clarification of the problem.

Structuralism will take linguistics as a reference. Ferdinand de Saussure distinguishes between language, as a system of signs suitable for communicative interaction within a society, and speech, which is the execution that speakers make of the language. According to Saussure, language is a stable system in which everything is held in opposition to the various individual manifestations of speech. In addition, the diversity of particular realizations of speech does not cause the language to change and cease to be a constant system.

The application of the method of structural linguistics to anthropology leads Levi-Strauss to affirm that current cultural anthropology deals above all with studying the particular manifestations of cultures and pointing out the similarities and observable differences between their constituent elements.

The structural anthropology of Levi-Strauss is based on the philosophical assumption that beyond the norms of culture or social organization that vary from one people to another, there are shared and identical structures that have their origin in the psychological, logical organization and epistemological of the human mind.

It is rather a philosophical and psychological explanation than properly sociological.

Comentarios

Publicar un comentario

Entradas populares de este blog

Giger y Davidhizar model (nursing and culture)

Imagen
The Transcultural Giger and Davidhizar evaluation model was developed in 1988 in response to the need for nursing students in an undergraduate program to assess and care for patients who were culturally diverse. The model includes six cultural phenomena: communication, time, space, social organization, environmental control, and biological variations. These provide a framework for patient assessment and culturally sensitive care can be designed. The Giger and Davidhizar Transcultural model postulates that each individual is culturally unique and should be evaluated according to six cultural phenomena: (A) communication, (b) space, (c) social organization, (d) time, (e) of the environmental control, and (f) the biological variations. Communication . Communication covers the whole world of human interaction and behavior. Communication is the medium through which culture is transmitted and preserved. Both verbal and non-verbal communication are learned in one's own culture. Sp
Leer más

Dr L.Purnell and Paulanka model

Imagen
This model is based on based on the cultural competence and its process: C ultural Competence  is the process of becoming aware of our culture, and how we communicate that awareness to the rest of the world.  The Purnell Model for Cultural Competence  is a sequence of circles or rings that each contain the development of this awareness of culture and how it continues to expand from the family to the whole world. The first ring of the model  holds the person. The  second ring of the model  holds the family. The  third ring of the model holds the community. The  outermost ring of the model  holds the global community. There are also different subsections inside each ring of the model that account for changes and evolution in the individual's cultural competence that include occupation, religion, education, politics, ethnicity and nationality, and gender. According to the model, all of these different subsections and circles continue on until the individual is culturally compet
Leer más

Main theories about Culture and Society

There are four main theories about Culture and Society that are: Evolutionism, particularism, diffusionism, Functionalism, Structuralism . Evolutionism In the second half of the 19th century, it was thought that culture developed uniformly. According to this anthropological model, all cultures and societies are governed by the same historical laws that determine their evolution. Edward B. Taylor was his representative. He affirms that every culture evolves from simple to complex and that all societies go through three great stages: savagery, barbarism and civilization. The savagery is a poorly developed system, based on hunting and gathering, barbarism, the invention of agriculture and the use of metals, and civilization is characterized by the appearance of writing. Taylor also said that culture follows a linear and progressive development, but many societies stop at their cultural development and fall behind other peoples; In addition, the cultural features of a stage never
Leer más